Samsung consequently receives two points, Google one, and Adobe is king of the hill yet again with three. Since Google created the most artifacts and hit the window sill a bit, Google ends up last. Once again, the photo was taken using Portrait Mode, so expect some blurring in the background.Īdobe is the winner again! You can't see a shadow here, nor any image flaws, nor is there anything of the scooter to be seen. With the next experiment, I fulfill the wish of many Berliners! That is because I had one of the annoying e-scooters which plague the cityscape erased. Example 5: Simply make annoying e-scooters disappear Adobe gets three points, Samsung and Google two each. The two features are about even here, so I'm awarding each the same score. With Google and Samsung, you can still see some shading. The clear winner is Adobe with its "copy-and-paste strategy"! Here you really can't see anything of the lamp that remains. As expected, the overall results were really good! My fourth example would be easy to replace on the computer with the copy stamp as the background is composed of a single color and here, you just have to brush over it quickly. Example 4: Camila has turned on the lights! Google gets three points, Samsung scores two, and Adobe receives only one. The image is exciting because you can see how Adobe works, as Photoshop picks another image element and tries to intelligently place an overlay on top of the background. The trash bag is completely gone and the background has been reconstructed quite well. This is because Google's Magic Eraser delivered the best results here.
Here's a winner other than Photoshop at long last! Why is there a garbage bag in front of the entrance? It doesn't matter, it bothered me a lot in my photo of Camila, so I had to digitally remove it. Adobe three, Google two, and Zois is sweating! Example 3: More complex background in front of a door Samsung still left something as well, and once again, it will only receive one point. Google has also removed the fan, but there are some nasty artifacts left behind. The fan is completely removed and the shading is best matched to the wall. But since I took the photos using Portrait Mode, the fan is a bit blurry.Īgain, Adobe performed the best here in my eyes. The background here is also monochrome, but the offending object is a bit more complex to 'erase'. While he wasn't bothered by the fan, it triggered me. In the next picture, the fan in the background was intentionally placed, as Zois is caught on camera working intently. Example 2: Zois freezes and magic erasers have to fix it Following Adobe, Google is awarded two points while Samsung comes in last! So there's only one point for Samsung, who left quite a bit of the image behind. However, removing it shouldn't be too difficult, right? After all, the area that does need to be replaced is monochrome in nature and is best softened with a slight brightness gradient.Īdobe's tool takes first place here in an obvious way here, consequently picking up three points. In the following example, the distracting element is located in the foreground. That's because the company places emphasis on you being able to remove distracting elements from the background. Not all examples are as perfect as Google would like them to be.
I've pitted all three "magic erasers" against each other, so let us get down to it! Example 1: Picture from the wall Not only that, Adobe Photoshop also has a couple of smart erasers available for users. Algorithms are capable of performing this to a certain degree, and we haven't just discovered this since the Pixel 6 because Samsung does offer an identical feature in the "Labs" section of its Gallery app. The challenge with manually erasing errors in a photo as well as distracting elements is the amount of skill and work required to reconstruct the background of the image.
0 kommentar(er)
